What this source contributes.
Examines fog-monitor sampling and sizing uncertainties. It supports instrument qualification and loss corrections; it does not validate a particular charged-droplet sampling arrangement.
Scope of our check
Primary methods and uncertainty discussion reviewed in the Weatherhill evidence audit.
Primary methods and uncertainty discussion reviewed in the Weatherhill evidence audit.
Primary material consulted
This is a bounded reading note. It is not independent replication, a full systematic review or an endorsement of every conclusion in the paper.
Questions to take to the paper
- Is the upstream reference matched to the downstream transit time?
- Which uncertainty components are random, and which are bounded biases?
- What is independently prepared: a reading, a run or a day?
Keep the evidence attached to its setting.
A simulation, chamber result, field observation and operational outcome answer different questions. Record the comparator, measured quantity and conditions before carrying a result into a design.
A simulation, chamber result, field observation and operational outcome answer different questions. Record the comparator, measured quantity and conditions before carrying a result into a design.
Bibliographic provenance
Verified 2026-10-11 against the publisher-deposited metadata record. Publication dates retain the precision supplied by the publisher. Metadata may reflect digital republication; it is not always the earliest historical publication date.