1960 / Charged droplets

Some electrostatic cloud-droplet collision efficiencies

Journal of Geophysical Research

Open publisher / DOI ↗
METADATA-VERIFIED RECORD

A record for discovery.

The title, deposited author list, journal, DOI and publication date were checked against publisher-deposited Crossref metadata. The title was screened for relevance to this research field.

We have not reviewed this article’s contents or scientific conclusions. Use the original source to assess the experimental design, results, uncertainty and limits.

Questions to take to the paper

  • Are charge and wet droplet size measured together?
  • Is a low-Reynolds-number drag approximation adequate?
  • Does a population shift reflect growth, evaporation or removal?
Keep the evidence attached to its setting.
A simulation, chamber result, field observation and operational outcome answer different questions. Record the comparator, measured quantity and conditions before carrying a result into a design.

Bibliographic provenance

Verified 2026-10-11 against the publisher-deposited metadata record. Publication dates retain the precision supplied by the publisher. Metadata may reflect digital republication; it is not always the earliest historical publication date.

Continue in this field.

Search weatherhill

Search papers, tools and the project.