Why collected water does not prove clearer air
A collector can change the water balance and the optical signal by different amounts. A visibility product has to measure both.
Read the note ↗
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE / RESEARCH EDITION 01
See the physics.
Measure the change.
A research home for fog, water and atmospheric electricity. Explore the evidence. Work with the tools. Help build the next experiment.
266 real papers. 15 working tools. One measured first step.
FOGLAB / VIABLE INITIAL PRODUCT
CONCEPT ARTWORK · EXPERIMENTS NOT YET RUN
CONCEPT ARTWORK · EXPERIMENTS NOT YET RUN
01 / THE SCIENCE
Start with a question.
From a single charged droplet to a cloud field. Follow a mechanism, inspect its evidence and find the measurement that would settle the next question.
FIELD 01
Fog & visibility
What is between us and a clear view?
35 papersFIELD 02Electrostatic collection
Can a field help water reach a surface?
18 papersFIELD 03Atmospheric electricity
How does charge move through air?
23 papersFIELD 04Charged droplets
How much charge changes a droplet?
18 papersFIELD 05Cloud seeding & rain
When can a rainfall change be attributed?
28 papersFIELD 08Metrology & trials
Can the measurement carry the claim?
24 papers
02 / OUR FIRST PRODUCTFogLab.
FogLab.
A measured first step.
We are developing an instrumented way to test electrostatic fog collection. The first question is precise: does powering a collector reduce optical extinction beyond the identical passive collector?
WX-FOG-001 defines the proposed experiment. Direct optical measurements come first, with droplet size, charge, airflow and whole-system energy alongside them.
PROTOCOL DESIGN · NO EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS YET
03 / THE WORKBENCH
Tools for the next question.
Useful calculations, visible assumptions and exportable results. Run them in your browser. Bring your own data to the spectrum and paired-trial tools.
TRY IT / VISIBILITY & EXTINCTION
What does transmission tell you?
Move the measured transmission along a 10 m optical path. Watch the inferred extinction and 5% optical range change.
A homogeneous attenuation model. Wavelength-specific range unless the WMO spectral requirements are met.
Open the complete tool ↗Optical workbenchLIVE CALCULATION
134.3Derived optical range · m
0.0223Extinction · m⁻¹
Optics
Droplet spectrum explorer
Compare number, water mass and approximate extinction across wet droplet sizes.
EngineeringFlow & collector area
Find face velocity and idealized fan input for a supplied area.
EngineeringWhole-system energy ledger
Keep air throughput, recovered water and electricity in the same ledger.
ElectrostaticsCharged droplet drift
Compare ideal electrical drift and gravitational settling in still air.
ExperimentsPaired fog-trial analysis
Analyze transit-aligned upstream/downstream means across independent days.
ExperimentsBalanced trial schedule
Export a reproducible, balanced C/D order across preparation days.
04 / THE RESEARCH NOTEBOOK
Read the reasoning.
Short, source-linked notes on the evidence, the corrections and the decisions shaping the first experiment.
What the powered-versus-passive collector test measures
The D/C comparison asks whether electrical operation adds an optical benefit to the same collector under matched conditions.
Read the note ↗Energy numbers need a boundary and a denominator
The published 38.3 Wh/kg estimate is useful context. Turning it into a product specification requires additional measurements and assumptions.
Read the note ↗THE WEATHERHILL APPROACH
A useful result needs a defined quantity, a fair comparison and a record someone else can inspect. That is how a physical possibility becomes an engineering decision.